Actual Possession of property is more recognizable than legal possession of property
Facts: Appellant was aggrieved because Bharat petroleum sub-let appellant property to a dealer and neither vacating nor paying any arrears of rent since 2009 because lease agreement was expired in 2009 between appellant and Bharat Petroleum way back before. Single judge and Division bench discarded the matter stating writ not maintainable under Article 226 power …
Actual Possession of property is more recognizable than legal possession of property Read More »